Editorial policy

Useful facts, linked to their source.

Our editorial process is designed to help learners compare options without turning provider marketing into an independent recommendation.

Last updated 29 September 2026
01

First-party evidence

Provider names, locations, formats, programme categories and course facts are taken from official provider, university or institutional sources. A link to the primary source stays close to the profile.

02

No invented details

We do not estimate fees, schedules, accreditation, outcomes, ratings or availability. When a material fact is unavailable or unclear, the page says so and asks readers to confirm it directly.

03

Provider and course records

Provider profiles summarise an institution and its published categories. Individual course records require a distinct first-party course source and identify when that evidence was checked.

04

Review and freshness

A source-check date records when our research desk reviewed the evidence. It is a transparency signal, not a guarantee that a provider has not changed a later intake.

05

Commercial separation

Advertising and future commercial services cannot purchase verification, a favourable description or an editorial ranking. Paid material must be clearly labelled and is governed by our advertising policy.

06

Corrections and accountability

Anyone may request a factual correction with a supporting official source. Corrections do not require payment, and material updates are reflected in the page’s review record.

Continue exploring

Compare the course.
Confirm the source.

Search providers →Read our methodology →